We’re No. 1

[Rawvo]

I guess announcing best picture for Hollywood is better than announcing new jobs from the White House? Its time to laugh it up with the elite and forget about the American sheeple and the economy from the Obama's. All this crap is just so odd at how it looks coming from America's White House?

Michelle Obama announces best picture from White House
Another surprise at the Academy Awards on Sunday: First lady Michelle Obama got to rip open the envelope and announce the winner for best picture, which turned out to be Argo.

Dressed in a slinky, silvery art-deco-inspired gown by Indian-American designer Naeem Khan, Obama was handed the envelope and tore it open. "And the winner is Argo. Congratulations!" she exclaimed.

The White House said the academy approached the first lady about being a part of the ceremony.

[inconu]

Obama’s Paycheck Exempted from ‘Sequester’
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obam...pted-sequester

"Let them eat cake"

[Rawvo]

Originally Posted by inconu

Obama’s Paycheck Exempted from ‘Sequester’
"Let them eat cake"

If they did take his paycheck away in the Sequester Bobo would just do another executive order to reinstate his paycheck like the good little socialist dictator he is.

[HarryN]

Rawvo - Perhaps consider to look at the situation with a longer viewpoint.

The reason that Romney didn't win, is that the average person didn't feel that his leadership was going to be "enough better" to bother changing presidents. It isn't that Obama is perfect, it is just that Romney's policies were not any better, and often were going to be the same.

The other reason that Romney lost, was because there is still a deep dislike for GWB and his policies among a lot of people, even fellow republicans. Romney would have backed the bankers just as much (or more) than Obama, which is not popular among the population as a whole, but the election money for everyone comes from the banks and hedge funds.

For better or worse, the democrats have now managed to shoot themselves in the foot and virtually make certain that a Republican will win the next presidency. The only way they can possibly loose is if they decide to back an anti- rights of the individual candidate, and let's face it - Romney is not a "pro gun rights" person. Even he could not put enough icing on his basic thoughts on the issue for people to believe that line.

[Rawvo]

Originally Posted by HarryN

The reason that Romney didn't win, is that the average person didn't feel that his leadership was going to be "enough better" to bother changing presidents.

A little less than "half" of America tipped the election towards Bobo and we all know that the half that voted for the Obama crap was a mix of dumbed down youth sheeple, racist blacks, welfare freeloaders and some hoping to give illegals a free backdoor citizenship into America. The other half of America that voted for Romney was purely looking for a better future with opportunity and jobs not handout and debt. I'm sure if we were to "only" count votes from the "working class Americans" and those that want more opportunity then Romney would have won the election easily.

Originally Posted by HarryN

It isn't that Obama is perfect, it is just that Romney's policies were not any better, and often were going to be the same.

Take away the free loaders and entitlement crowd from the election equation and Romney's policies are what the majority of working class America wanted in a landslide. Romney Energy and trade policies were not the same.

The other reason that Romney lost, was because there is still a deep dislike for GWB and his policies among a lot of people, even fellow republicans.

The bias libtard cheerleading media we have today is what created the imaginary dislike for GWB which is nothing in comparison to what our current POTUS is doing today. Romney had to fight many different fronts to win the election from a bias media to a BSing POTUS dividing our country with class warfare, racism, and blame game on why we are still in an economic decline after four years of his policies.

Romney would have backed the bankers just as much (or more) than Obama, which is not popular among the population as a whole, but the election money for everyone comes from the banks and hedge funds.

That's what the bias media would want one to believe to keep theri messiah in the driver seat. We cant say whether Romney would have backed the bankers more but then why would it matter if we are not holding our current POTUS accountable for doing just that. Romney was not my favorite choice as candidate but I believe he would have been a great POTUS in comparison to the never ending disaster we have now.

For better or worse, the democrats have now managed to shoot themselves in the foot and virtually make certain that a Republican will win the next presidency. The only way they can possibly loose is if they decide to back an anti- rights of the individual candidate, and let's face it - Romney is not a "pro gun rights" person. Even he could not put enough icing on his basic thoughts on the issue for people to believe that line.

The truth is Obama had to BS his way to win this election blaming everyone and had plenty of help in the process with his liberal state run media covering his back like good little soldiers. Romney may have not been fully pro gun rights person but he would have respected the rights of what the majority of Americans would want and not threaten executive order like our little dictator has been doing. One just needs to look closely at how insecure our country feels today under the Obama dictatorship when guns and ammo are selling out in record numbers thought the county.

[Rawvo]

Originally Posted by HarryN

Rawvo - Perhaps consider to look at the situation with a longer viewpoint.

The reason that Romney didn't win, is that the average person didn't feel that his leadership was going to be "enough better" to bother changing presidents.

Correction "A little more than half" of American voters tipped the election over to Obama. Maybe you can understand my viewpoint by understanding who actually voted for Romney.

Who voted for Obama? People addicted to every form of welfare

America wasted countless billions to produce the same political metrics it had Nov. 5th. The electorate intentionally handcuffed Obama with a Republican Congress after observing his spending binge of 2008/2009. They did not have the courage to vote for Romney to improve their job prospects and an improved economy over welfare handouts. Future presidential aspirants take notice. The current electorate is going to ignore candidates with a long resume of business experience and evidence of leadership that leads to their wealth and success. To the future, TYPICAL Democratic voter, a failed, destitute, ignorant, drunk will offer better prospects if he utters the magic words "more cheese" while muttering, I think I feel your pain when I'm sober. Democrats want " cheese" over improving prospects of finding a JOB or a world class economy. Business acumen and accomplishment in the future will be ANCHORS of qualification to be president (as they were for Romney) as incredible as it sounds. THE 47 percent care NOTHING of presidential qualifications or tax policy or spending restraint or intelligence. Why would they? They have no financial stake in AMERICA. Presidential failure to produce growth or jobs will not seen as justification for removal. It is a real wake up call just how far this country has lowered it's standards, prostituted its values and compromised it's principles. The country that lead the world for a century has become sadly just another steadily eroding, government controlled, bureaucracy, welfare state assuring declining living standards for everyone. Most of all the middle class that will fall from that plateau. It is ALREADY HAPPENING and we vote for more "Cheese please" from the king of cheddar handouts Barack Obama.
Just who Did and DID NOT vote for Obama .

1. The population over age 65 by majority didn't vote for Obama. They voted for Romney.

2. The married people across America did not by majority vote for Obama. They voted for Romney.

3. Those defined as religious, church going people did did not vote by majority for Obama. They voted for Romney.

4. The whites who dominate race by population in America did not by majority vote for Obama. They voted overwhelmingly for Romney 59 percent.

5. The white, WORKING CLASS, BLUE COLLAR Americans did not by majority vote for Obama. They voted for Romney.

6. The JOB CREATORS of America did not vote by majority for Obama. They voted for Romney.

7. The BUSINESS COMMUNITY did not vote for Obama by majority. They voted for Romney.

8. The entrepreneurs did not vote for Obama by majority. They voted for Romney.

9. The people who PAY income taxes and hold jobs did not vote by majority for Obama. They voted for Romney.

10 The successful innovators and creators that bring you i-phones and i-pads did not vote for Obama. They voted for Romney.

11. The land area of America did not vote for Obama. 70 percent of the counties in America voted by majority for Romney.

Who the hell voted for Obama? The people ADDICTED to every form of GOVERNMENT welfare, from food stamps to 99 weeks of unemployment that was once 26. Government employees, public employees and especially public employee unions of every type; all people trying to suck the life out of taxpayers through higher tax levies on EVERYTHING to fund higher wages/benefits for themselves. Of course the minorities who seek riches through their vote rather than their work under wealth distribution and some Obama induced fantasy notion of guaranteed economic EQUALITY as if this were socialist America not capitalist America. The almost half of America (47 percent) who pay NO INCOME TAXES almost all vote for Obama. Why? He assures them they WILL NEVER pay any taxes.
The young voted for Obama. Millions of them are in debt up to their eye balls and jobless holding degrees in Ancient Egyptian Antiquities while we need people to program robots. The youth are INOCULCATED with "DONKEY DUMB" by every teacher and professor for 16 straight years. Public schools and colleges are nothing more than training grounds for Democratic dogma, instilling the democrats view of POLITICS into children 24/7. Tell me about the last teachers union from K to grad school you saw supporting ANY Republican candidates for office? There are 3.2 million public school teachers, almost all vote union donkey because they want higher taxes ON YOU to benefit THEM all while macro education fails us ALL miserably. Review the 2012 SAT scores, where you can get a REAL EDUCATION.

[HarryN]

I see that you have pretty strong feelings on the subject.

For me, I am faced with an interesting reality, living here in CA.
- If I vote for a repub, the state will still vote demo.
- If demo, the state will still vote demo
- Neither party has been fielding candidates that I believe represent my views rights of the individual.

In other words, my vote largely does not count.

Intead, I vote libertarian, which is what the republican party "used to be" before reagan ruined it.

Romney lost, because he could not bring independents to the table, simple as that. They didn't trust him anymore than they trust Obama.

You have to really be kidding to imagine that if a TX guy like GWB didn't even go to bat for Americans to own guns in the SC (Cheney did it in spite of Bush) that a guy like Romney from an urban state who would not know how to use a screw driver would stand up for gun rights. Even NJ Christie just managed to blow his chance of being a candidate with his positions on individual rights.

The only viable candidate the rep have today is Sarah Palin or maybe Rand Paul, and I don't know if that will fly or not. Of course the dems have basically no one, so that makes the generic libertarian as good as anyone else.

[Rawvo]

Originally Posted by HarryN

I see that you have pretty strong feelings on the subject.

Just sitting back watching the show as our little socialist destroys America. Its really not worth complaining anymore after the election but rather preparing more for economic decline for the next few years.

Originally Posted by HarryN

For me, I am faced with an interesting reality, living here in CA.
In other words, my vote largely does not count.

You are screwed and your only options is to continue to be the host till all the parasites suck CA into a failed state or get the hell out to a more economically responsible state.

Even NJ Christie just managed to blow his chance of being a candidate with his positions on individual rights.

Christie has proven he has no core beliefs or principles and is a moron that only cares about his reelection by pandering to liberal voters instead of educating them on theri individual rights.

The only viable candidate the rep have today is Sarah Palin or maybe Rand Paul, and I don't know if that will fly or not. Of course the dems have basically no one, so that makes the generic libertarian as good as anyone else.

Rand Paul is to much of a nice guy to win an election against a bias liberal smear machine and Palin will end up being a distraction to our country as the wild rabid liberal dogs along with the media will just constantly be attacking her and her family.
Republicans need a strong and "outspoken" conservative that will clearly "fight back" against the bias liberal media while explaining to the few misinformed American voters what the deference is in liberalism and conservatism.
Future conservatives can learn from Newt Gingrich on how to handle the bias media.

[HarryN]

The media is just a distraction that the bankers use to get their favorite people elected and laws passed to push taxes on the average American rather than on them.

I am not qualified to try to politically position the media, since it is really foreign controlled either directly or indirectly, and pretty much always has been.

Rand may or may not have a chance - not sure. If he can build on his father's coat tails instead of striking out on his own, it might work at some point.

As a practical matter, I can get along with about anyone, but I will admit, it makes me uncomfortable to have congressmen with dual citizenship. I don't really care where a person is from, but it seems like a person should be willing to make a decision about their citizenship by the time they are 18. It is like having 2 wives and wondering why they aren't completely comfortable with your committment to them.