Zimmerman Killed Trayvon in 'Self-Defense' Blacks Use Race Card & Mob Rule.

[spademan]

Originally Posted by DieselBurps

Spademan, see what I mean about the severe autism and the anal-retentive obsessive-compulsive? The difference is that the autistic person doesn't intentionally be difficult, while the anal-retentive obsessive compulsive goes out of his way to be an immature prick. Note how hung up he is about other's being wrong - but is completely oblivious to the many mistakes he makes himself? Note how consistent he is about that - and how his reactions are the same to everyone that demonstrates his flaws.

Perhaps banding him is the best solution.

I have a democrat friend(I know very hard to believe) that has this problem.
Well, he's actually more of an aquaintence.
He corrects me on insignificant details of our discussion, while at the same time glossing over pertinent facts like 19 terrorists attacked the NYC Trade towers,
traces of WMD were found in Iraq, BOBO has increased the deficit more than all of the previous presidents combined.
It's funny how all the LNJs gloss over these facts.

I wonder if banding is constitutional?

[spademan]

Originally Posted by phil

Then you probably shouldn't have said you "didn't get murder AT ALL from post # 67".

Again, based on my understanding of the poster's comments, this was not the focal point of the text, but rather a scarcastic footnote to the post. (again, my interpretation)
So no, I did not get murder at all from what the poster was trying to convey.

Now, if I was a proofreader at a publisher, and someone had asked me,"Is the word murder in the post # 67"? , then my answer would have been yes.

[DieselBurps]

Originally Posted by spademan

I wonder if banding is constitutional?

I'm sure it is when applied to liberals and trolling, anal-retentive, obsessive-compulsives. It's not like you would be hurting a human, or even a lesser animal. They are vermin - like roaches or rats. Step on them without concern.

[phil]

Originally Posted by spademan

He corrects me on insignificant details of our discussion, while at the same time glossing over pertinent facts like 19 terrorists attacked the NYC Trade towers,

Can you explain that one a little?

[spademan]

Originally Posted by phil

Can you explain that one a little?

An insignificant detail to me would be that we are in Iraq because of 9/11.

We were attacked.

He brings up that GWB would have invaded Iraq no matter what because of the 1996 assasination attempt on his father by Saddam Hussein.

To me, it's insignificant because it cannot be proven, and 19 terrorists did attack us on 9/11 by hijacking and bombing the WTC's and the Pentagon. And the liberal view is that Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism, in spite of the fact that there were terrorist training camps in their country being supported by the Saddam Hussein regime.

Before this post gets sideways, hindsight is 20/20 and I now wish that not only would we have not invaded Iraq, but also stayed out of Afganistan as well.

There are little liberal side streets that he always wants to go down to convolute the discussion.

[inconu]

The blacks are all uppity because the media is encouraging them. The leftist media is hyping the Zimmerman-Martin incident to keep the sheeple distracted from more important events. Such as the House just rejected Obama's budget, the Supremes are about to reject Obamacare, and GM is about to move most of it's auto production offshore and close down plants in the US.

[spademan]

Originally Posted by inconu

The blacks are all uppity because the media is encouraging them. The leftist media is hyping the Zimmerman-Martin incident to keep the sheeple distracted from more important events. Such as the House just rejected Obama's budget, the Supremes are about to reject Obamacare, and GM is about to move most of it's auto production offshore and close down plants in the US.

Excellent point!

I just commented to my wife last night that fox was the only network giving correct coverage on the supreme court, that it was much more important and landmark than yet another gangsta getting his due!

You would think that Martin/Zimmerman was the only thing going on across the entire globe by listening to PMSNBC.

[Chris Mann]

Originally Posted by inconu

The blacks are all uppity because... .

Wow!Your white-trash roots really shows with that type of statement.It's hard to believe small minded folk like you still exist in 2012.

[phil]

Just to be fair, NPR has broadcast the three Supreme Court sessions. Unedited.

[phil]

Originally Posted by spademan

An insignificant detail to me would be that we are in Iraq because of 9/11.

We were attacked.

He brings up that GWB would have invaded Iraq no matter what because of the 1996 assasination attempt on his father by Saddam Hussein.

To me, it's insignificant because it cannot be proven, and 19 terrorists did attack us on 9/11 by hijacking and bombing the WTC's and the Pentagon. And the liberal view is that Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism, in spite of the fact that there were terrorist training camps in their country being supported by the Saddam Hussein regime.

Before this post gets sideways, hindsight is 20/20 and I now wish that not only would we have not invaded Iraq, but also stayed out of Afganistan as well.

There are little liberal side streets that he always wants to go down to convolute the discussion.

I'm still not quite sure where the 19 hijackers (not bombers) fit into all this, but if you want to leave it at that, that's okay with me.

I believe the initial invasion of Afghanistan was totally justified, worthwhile and mostly succesful. We stayed way too long and lost too many lives and spent too much money, but we did get Osama.

I really don't know why we went to Iraq, I don't think anyone else really knows why and I don't know if we should have. I do know we also lost too many lives there and spent too much money.